Arguments for and Against Term Limits Essay Example for Free

Arguments for and Against Term Limits EssayMy research indicated there is more public sustentation for terminal limits. The most common reason was voters feel dissatisfied and misrepresented by the candidate in office. It is believed that career politicians are elitists and do non have a clear understanding of what real the great unwashed are dealing with or need. Term limits would create an even playing field for newcomers allowing new ideas and scented thinkers into the mix. Newcomers would be less influenced by special interests and compact corruption.Those opposed to term limits primarily support the presumptuousness that replacing seasoned conveyd politicians with inexperienced members that are unfamiliar with the issues is detrimental to moving things forward. It takes years of experience to get up to speed on the issues and the rules of government. Limiting terms would be restrictive and eliminate the nigh(a) guy politicians that are doing a good job representing the people. It is common that term limited politicians are not as committed toward the end of their term because they dont have to worry about their criminal record of accomplishments for re-election.When I first started to work on this assignment I was convinced that I was in esteem of term limits for federally-elected officials. I was convinced that term limits were a good idea in order to reduce corruption and generate fresh ideas. After doing some initial research I realized that term limits are not the solution to government reform. The people elect government officials. It is up to the voters to vote in change, get involved, and support their candidate of choice. Voting is a civil liberty for all secured by the sacrifices of others. It is our citizen business to invoke our right to vote and to be informed, educated voters.Referenceshtttp//dbp.idebate.org /en/index.php/Debate_Term_limits_for_legislators http//suite101.com/article/term-limits-are-set-at-the-polls-a214115